Categories

    Subscribe

      Want to stay up-to-date on all of the latest news and research from Return Path's email deliverability experts? We'll send 'em as we post 'em. Usually 2-4 posts a week.


      Subscribe to the blog feed:

       

      Subscribe: Email or RSS

       

      Categories: Response

      Oct
      09

      A Lesson from The Onion

      Bonnie Malone Fry
      By Bonnie Malone Fry
      Director, Strategic Services

      In a recent article featured on The Onion, Presidential candidate Barack Obama expressed his personal frustrations in receiving an onslaught of emails from the polictical association MoveOn.org. He subscribed to the organization's email program 4 years ago, but continues to receive email after months of deleting it without reading a single message. He finds the content uninteresting and not valuable, and the frequency (3x a week) highly irritating. Of course it's immediately obvious why this is so funny - MoveOn.org has gained a reputation as a very aggressive email marketer.

      But, aside from being so funny, The Onion spoof offers a good object lesson for marketers. Because it's all too easy to think, what's the big deal if people delete your email daily without reading it? But this piece hits a nerve because it articulates the deeper reaction that subscriber's have to too frequent, irrelevant messages. Due to this experience the fictionalized Barack Obama doesn't just have distaste for the MoveOn.org emails -- that distaste has grown to include the organization itself. That is so much bigger than just one less click or open for the marketer.

      You see, it's common for the marketer to focus on his corner of the world - - living and breathing everything email, with little regard for anything else. What is made painfully apparent through Obama's imaginary experience is that those marketers fail to see how email is an integral part of their company's overall marketing efforts, and more importantly how it impacts brand perception. Email is a very personal communication method. When marketers lose sight of the subscriber experience and fudge practices like segmentation and list cleansing, it not only results in negative response behavior, but drives a more deep rooted negative brand perception. Is it worth losing subscribers - and ultimately customers, readers, or members to your brand - because of sloppy or undefined email contact methodology? No.

      So I encourage you to perform a health check on your program, asking yourself these questions:


      • Do you ask permission and set a clear expectation at the point of subscribe?
      • How does your program content mesh with other business channels and objectives?
      • At what point do you consider a subscriber inactive?
      • What is your re-activation strategy for inactive subscribers?
      • When do you stop mailing subscribers altogether?
      • How smooth is the unsubscribe process?
      • How quickly after unsubscribe do you remove the subscriber from your file?

      Your answers could reveal that you, too, have lost sight of the power of email to impact your brand perception, and highlight the biggest areas of opportunity for you to make an impact.

      blog comments powered by Disqus
       
      Products Services Become A Partner   Resources About Us   Sites
      Certification for Senders Deliverability Consulting ESP Partner   Client Case Studies About Us   Client Login
      Certification for ISPs Feedback Loop Management ISP Data Partner   IN The Know Blog Careers   Senderscore.org
      Deliverability Monitoring Tools Reputation Data Network     Research Studies Press Office   Support
      Reputation Network Blacklist Response Consulting     Webinars and Events      

      Privacy  |  Copyright 2010 Return Path, Inc.